Tuesday 24 October 2017

#PauseAndFix - Why are we Waiting for Universal Credit?

Here's the text of an email I sent my MP ahead of last week's Opposition debate on Universal Credit.  While there has, rightly, been increasing concern about the built-in six-week delay prior to the first payment, another waiting issue hasn't made the headlines...

I am delighted that Labour have won a debate on a proposal to pause the roll-out of Universal Credit.  For the good of millions of less well-off citizens, it is vital that this happens. 

Personally, I think Universal Credit is so flawed that it should be stopped in its tracks and the whole project reworked, as it is simply not fit to be at the core of our Social Security system for a generation or more.  I’m sure others will have briefed you on the many problems being encountered with UC.  Rightly, the long wait for the first payment has been grabbing the headlines recently but there is another issue around ‘waiting’ that seems to have slipped below the radar, and that is the seven ‘waiting days’ at the start of new claims.

Since 2014, when the number was increased from three, the first seven days of your claim for JSA or ESA have been ‘waiting days’ for which you receive no benefit.  If you lodged a claim today (13th October), your payments would be based on entitlement from 20th October.  However, there are no waiting days for Income Support and Tax Credits, while Housing Benefit awards are usually calculated from the Monday following your date of claim.  Someone claiming JSA or ESA for her/himself and her/his partner therefore has seven days without payment of that benefit at the start of their claim, but can get support for their children and housing costs during that first week.  Someone claiming Income Support (usually a carer or lone parent) also receives their earnings replacement benefit from their date of claim.

As you know, Universal Credit rolls all of these benefits into one.  It also counts the first seven days of the claim as ‘waiting days’ in the majority of new claims.  This means that a UC claimant not only misses out on their earnings replacement benefit for seven days, they receive no support for their children for that week, nor for their housing costs.  For a jobless couple with two children and rent of £100 per week, instead of missing out on around £115 due to waiting days under the current regime, they would be over £300 down under UC.  For larger families and where rents are higher than they are in Stoke-on-Trent (ie. just about everywhere!) the losses from extending the waiting day principle to children and housing costs can be significantly higher. 

The higher this shortfall for the first week, the less chance there is of the family affected being able to clear the debts built up as a result – especially rent arrears – when their first payment eventually arrives.  For those not working, UC gives them an income set at no more than the minimum this Government believes they need to live on; for families hit by the Benefit Cap, it is often very much less.  They have no money to clear debts and pay down rent arrears.  By the time working families have paid travelling costs and part of their childcare, they too are unlikely to have spare cash. 

I do hope you will be able to support the call for a UC roll-out pause when it comes to Parliament as I genuinely believe there is a chance to win this vote.  I hope you will also be able to support your colleagues lobbying for further major reforms of UC; you might urge a review of the ‘waiting days’ concept as one way to make it less punishing.